Shruti, like many others, sees endowment policies as an inefficient way of looking after security and Investment needed. His requirements are two-fold: one, that he gets adequate insurance cover at a competitive price and second, that he be able to make better use of his funds, which are currently being used to pay premiums on his policies.
With her existing policies, Shruti has options to either let the policies lapse, surrender the policies or pay them.
If she allows the policy to lapse by non-payment of further premiums, she suffers a loss of at least 50% of the premiums paid in the last five years. Paying-up the policy will mean that the cover will continue for the reduced Sum Assured during the remaining term. While Shruti will not be required to pay any further premiums, the proportionate Sum Assured will be received only on the maturity of the policy. This may indicate an opportunity cost as the fund will remain blocked and earn lower returns rather than being positioned in a better investment product.
Surrendering the policy will mean that a part of the premium already paid will be returned to Shruti. Since Shruti’s policies have been in place for some time, she will now have a good surrender value which she can immediately invest in the products of her choice, which have the potential of high returns. He should also start investment program from time to time with the money saved on premium, so that he cannot spend this amount. Taken together, the same outlay will now give Shruti a good insurance cover as well as investment.
(Content on this page is courtesy of Center for Investment Education and Learning (CIEL). Contributions by Girija Gadre, Aarti Bhargava and Labh Mehta.)